![]()
| Student: | Topic: |
| Date: | Teacher: Mrs. Gurwicz |
|
Items |
4 pts |
3 pts |
2 pts |
1 pt |
|
Content - |
All content
throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. |
Most of the
content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be
inaccurate. |
The content is
generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or
inaccurate. |
Content is
typically confusing or contains more than one error. |
|
Background |
Choice of
background is visually appealing and is appropriate for the topic.
Choice enhances presentation. |
Choice of
background is consistent from card to card. |
Background does
not detract from text or other graphics. |
Background makes
it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page. |
|
Sequencing of |
Information is
organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of
material that might be on the next card. |
Most information
is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item seems out of
place. |
Some information
is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems
out of place. |
There is no
clear plan for the organization of information. |
|
Text - Font |
Font formats
(e.g., color, bold, italic) and custom animation has
been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
Transitions are effective. |
Font formats
have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
Most animations and transitions are effectively planned. |
Font formatting
has been carefully planned to complement readability and content. It may
be a little hard to read. Animations
and transitions need to be improved. |
Font formatting
makes it very difficult to read the material.
Animations and transitions don’t work correctly. |
|
Use of |
All graphics are
effective (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the
presentation. Use meets
stated criteria for project. Animation
of graphics effectively enhances presentation. |
A few graphics
are not effective but all support the theme/content of the presentation. Use meets stated criteria. |
All graphics are
effective but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the
presentation.. Use meets
stated criteria. |
Several graphics
are not effective and detract from the content of the presentation. Use does not meet stated criteria. |
|
Effectiveness |
Project includes
all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It
is a highly effective study guide. |
Project includes
most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material
but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide. |
Project is
missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study
guide. |
Project is
lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor
study guide |
|
Documentation |
You have
properly documented the required number of resources on your topic. |
You have
properly documented less than the required number of good sources for
your topic. |
You have
properly documented less than the required number of sources for your
topic, some of which are weak. |
You have not
properly documented the sources for your topic and the sources are too
few or inappropriate. |
To the People
and Projects
Comments? Email Mrs. Gurwicz
Last Updated: 04/17/06